Both Empiricism and Skepticism are concepts that have to do with belief. Both call two different philosophical currents that focus on the search for “truth”; however, they differ in the way they look at and handle the information or knowledge presented to the methods that each one offers.
Although there are certain similarities between Skepticism and Empiricism, you still have to take into account the importance of knowing the difference between one and the other.
If you have doubts about it or are simply looking for a little more complementary information, continue reading, because below we will explain what the difference between Empiricism and Skepticism is.
EMPIRICISM Difference Between Empiricism and Skepticism
This is a philosophical concept that derives from the Greek word “empeiria”, which could be translated as “experience” and is related to the word “experiment”; therefore, Empiricism refers to the idea that knowledge comes only or primarily from the sensory experience that is collected thanks to the work and use of the five senses.
According to Empiricism, all knowledge derives from what we can observe and experience in the world around us. If we cannot see it, observe it, experience it or taste it; then it doesn’t exist.
Given the method to approach the truth offered by this philosophical current (in which it is necessary that the facts can be proven), it is not surprising that Empiricism is associated with science and research; having this as a result of establishing what is known as the Scientific Method.
On the other hand, the term “skepticism” has become very common in everyday speech, almost always used in relation to someone who greatly doubts the veracity or authenticity of things ; However, in the context of Philosophy, this concept has another definition.
Skepticism comes from the classic Greek verb ‘skeptomai’ which means ‘to seek’, and has an implication that what is sought is not found.
Finally, there are people who claim that Skepticism, at least in its original context, has nothing to do with doubt, lack of belief or negativity; but rather with a search for the truth. It is seen as the process of finding a well-founded conclusion, not a justification for a preconceived conclusion.